Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Date/TimeLocationTare (g)Wet (g)Dry (g)Density (g/cm^3)Qsoil (m^3cm^3/m^3cm^3) %EC5 Reading (m^3cm^3/m^3cm^3) %
20 Feb 2015/1157bao, 2--5cm5.58100.7483.541.1725.8923.98
20 Feb 2015/1112bao, 10--13cm2.1599.5987.361.2818.4116.38
20 Feb 2015/1129bao, 20-23cm2.5089.5178.511.1416.5613.17
9 Mar 2015/1430ehs, 2--5cm16.477152.333127.7411.6737.0228.4

 

Note: Dry taken 23 Feb after air-drying in the lab for 3 days, then baking in the toaster oven for an hour.  (The oven got rid of about another 1.5g in each sample.)

The results show all EC5s about 2% low (which could be due to coupling to the soil, just after installation). 

Note2: 9 Mar sample processed as 2 aliquots (since scale range was limited).  The sum of both aliquots is shown in the above table.

tare = c(5.58,2.15,2.50,16.477)

wet = c(100.74,99.59,89.51,152.333)-tare

dry = c(83.54,87.36,78.51,127.741)-tare

vol = 3*pi*(5.31/2)^2

rho = dry/vol

moist = (100*(wet-dry)/volrho = dry/vol) # density numerically equal to volume mixing ratio since rho_water = 1.

ec5 = c(23.98,16.38,13.17,28.4)

matplot(moist,ec5,xlim=c(0,6040),ylim=c(0,6040)); abline(0,1,lty=2)