...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
data_dump -i 4,20 -A 200m_20150423_160000.dat | more ... 2015 04 23 19:30:17.3598 1.001 37 TRH30 15.13 27.28 34 0 1377 56 107\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:18.3691 1.009 37 TRH30 15.09 27.28 33 0 1376 56 105\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:19.3691 1 37 TRH30 15.13 27.28 34 0 1377 56 108\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:20.3692 1 37 TRH30 15.09 27.28 33 0 1376 56 103\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:21.3790 1.01 37 TRH30 15.09 27.28 34 0 1376 56 108\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:22.6191 1.24 40 TRH30 177.00 260.02 36 0 5510 886 112\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:23.6290 1.01 40 TRH30 177.00 260.18 35 0 5510 885 109\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:24.6290 1 40 TRH30 177.04 260.21 34 0 5511 885 106\r\n 2015 04 23 19:30:25.6398 1.011 40 TRH30 177.08 260.40 33 0 5512 884 105\r\n |
Notice the delta-Ts T column after the datetime. I've looked at a few of these, and I think that there is always a larger deltat-T (in this case 1.24 sec instead of 1.0 ) at the time of the initial bad data, in case that might help in debugging.