Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Thanks for running the corrections and statistics, Steve! I'll write up a little blurb to put on the blog about how the tilt correction method works. 
Cheers, 
Katie
On 7/9 Katherine sent an email with revised tilts for the NW sonics and the tilts for the flux stations:
Hi Gordon, I have the planar fit coefficients for the flux stations below, as well as a corrected version of the northwest booms' tilts (I found an error in it). The southeast sonics are unchanged.
Sorry for the delay - confusion with Tom Horst, so I ended up taking out 45 degrees on either side of the boom as you'd suggested! 
50m_nw:   -0.0092    0.0216    0.0044
100m_nw:   -0.0014    0.0268    0.0040
150m_nw:   -0.0052    0.0182   -0.0139
200m_nw:   -0.0054    0.0117   -0.0072
250m_nw:    0.0106    0.0107    0.0065
300m_nw:    0.0622    0.0061    0.0130
50m_se:   -0.0088   -0.0107   -0.0133
100m_se:   -0.0258    0.0012    0.0060
150m_se:   -0.0169    0.0011   -0.0038
200m_se:   -0.0059    0.0045   -0.0059
250m_se:   -0.0126    0.0027    0.0162
300m_se:    0.0692   -0.0097    0.0019
5m_ehs:  -0.0027   0.0288   -0.0035
5m_bao:  -0.0064   -0.0087   0.0010