28 May 2014
John Clyne, scott, alan
We reviewed and approved the WASP API
With the most recent commits to the 3.0 branch the number of documented class methods has grown quite large. One of the aims of refactoring effort is to facilitate extensibility by both 3rd parties and the NCAR development team. However, it is becoming difficult to identify both which classes and which class methods are needed by potential developers. Possible ways to improve this situation include:
We also discussed the need for producing a spreadsheet to track class objects that have "passed review". Once a class has passed we hopefully need to longer continue to review it.
Alan is very close to having a prototype that is ready for review. We discussed the need to address some of the above to help the review process.
Description | Who |
---|---|
Experiment with C++ namepace options to see how we might use them to help identify public classes/methods | Alan |
Research options in Doxygen to improve identification of public class/methods | John |
Create spread sheet to check-off completed (reviewed) classess | John |